Skip to content

Jamie Dimon, the Anti Christ?

April 3, 2010

from Baseline:

  1. Big companies need big banks, operating across borders, with large balance sheets and the ability to execute a wide variety of transactions.  This is simply not true – if we are discussing banking at the current and future proposed scale of JP Morgan Chase.  We go through this in detail in 13 Bankers – in fact, refuting this point in detail, with all the evidence on the table, was a major motivation for writing the book.  There is simply no evidence – and I mean absolutely none – that society gains from banks having a balance sheet larger than $100 billion.  (JP Morgan Chase is roughly a $2 trillion bank, on its way to $3 trillion.)
  2. The US banking system is not particularly concentrated relative to other OECD countries.  This is true – although the degree of concentration in the US has increased dramatically over the past 15 years (again, details in 13 Bankers) and in key products, such as credit cards and mortgages, it is now high.  But in any case, the comparison with other countries doesn’t help Mr. Dimon at all – because most other countries are struggling with the consequences of banks that became too large relative to their economies (e.g., in Europe; see Ireland as just one illustrative example).
  3. Canada did fine during 2008-09 despite having a relatively concentrated financial system.  Mr. Dimon would obviously like to move in the Canadian direction – and top people in the White House are also very much tempted.  This is frightening.  Not only does it represent a complete misunderstanding of the government guarantees behind banking in Canada (which we have clarified here recently), but this proposal – at its heart – would allow, in the US context, even more complete state capture than what we have observed under the stewardship of Hank Paulson and Tim Geithner.  Place this question in the context of American history (as we do in Chapter 1 of 13 Bankers): If the US had just five banks left standing, would their political power and ideological sway be greater or less than it is today?
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: